kanidmd_lib/server/access/create.rs
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196
use super::profiles::{
AccessControlCreateResolved, AccessControlReceiverCondition, AccessControlTargetCondition,
};
use crate::prelude::*;
use std::collections::BTreeSet;
pub(super) enum CreateResult {
Denied,
Grant,
}
enum IResult {
Denied,
Grant,
Ignore,
}
pub(super) fn apply_create_access<'a>(
ident: &Identity,
related_acp: &'a [AccessControlCreateResolved],
entry: &'a Entry<EntryInit, EntryNew>,
) -> CreateResult {
let mut denied = false;
let mut grant = false;
// This module can never yield a grant.
match protected_filter_entry(ident, entry) {
IResult::Denied => denied = true,
IResult::Grant | IResult::Ignore => {}
}
match create_filter_entry(ident, related_acp, entry) {
IResult::Denied => denied = true,
IResult::Grant => grant = true,
IResult::Ignore => {}
}
if denied {
// Something explicitly said no.
CreateResult::Denied
} else if grant {
// Something said yes
CreateResult::Grant
} else {
// Nothing said yes.
CreateResult::Denied
}
}
fn create_filter_entry<'a>(
ident: &Identity,
related_acp: &'a [AccessControlCreateResolved],
entry: &'a Entry<EntryInit, EntryNew>,
) -> IResult {
match &ident.origin {
IdentType::Internal => {
trace!("Internal operation, bypassing access check");
// No need to check ACS
return IResult::Grant;
}
IdentType::Synch(_) => {
security_critical!("Blocking sync check");
return IResult::Denied;
}
IdentType::User(_) => {}
};
debug!(event = %ident, "Access check for create event");
match ident.access_scope() {
AccessScope::ReadOnly | AccessScope::Synchronise => {
security_access!("denied ❌ - identity access scope is not permitted to create");
return IResult::Denied;
}
AccessScope::ReadWrite => {
// As you were
}
};
// Build the set of requested classes and attrs here.
let create_attrs: BTreeSet<&str> = entry.get_ava_names().collect();
// If this is empty, we make an empty set, which is fine because
// the empty class set despite matching is_subset, will have the
// following effect:
// * there is no class on entry, so schema will fail
// * plugin-base will add object to give a class, but excess
// attrs will cause fail (could this be a weakness?)
// * class is a "may", so this could be empty in the rules, so
// if the accr is empty this would not be a true subset,
// so this would "fail", but any content in the accr would
// have to be validated.
//
// I still think if this is None, we should just fail here ...
// because it shouldn't be possible to match.
let create_classes: BTreeSet<&str> = match entry.get_ava_iter_iutf8(Attribute::Class) {
Some(s) => s.collect(),
None => {
admin_error!("Class set failed to build - corrupted entry?");
return IResult::Denied;
}
};
// Find the set of related acps for this entry.
//
// For each "created" entry.
// If the created entry is 100% allowed by this acp
// IE: all attrs to be created AND classes match classes
// allow
// if no acp allows, fail operation.
let allow = related_acp.iter().any(|accr| {
// Assert that the receiver condition applies.
match &accr.receiver_condition {
AccessControlReceiverCondition::GroupChecked => {
// The groups were already checked during filter resolution. Trust
// that result, and continue.
}
AccessControlReceiverCondition::EntryManager => {
// Currently, this is unsatisfiable for creates.
return false;
}
};
match &accr.target_condition {
AccessControlTargetCondition::Scope(f_res) => {
if !entry.entry_match_no_index(f_res) {
trace!(?entry, acs = %accr.acp.acp.name, "entry DOES NOT match acs");
// Does not match, fail this rule.
return false;
}
}
};
// -- Conditions pass -- now verify the attributes.
let entry_name = entry.get_display_id();
security_access!(%entry_name, acs = ?accr.acp.acp.name, "entry matches acs");
// It matches, so now we have to check attrs and classes.
// Remember, we have to match ALL requested attrs
// and classes to pass!
let allowed_attrs: BTreeSet<&str> = accr.acp.attrs.iter().map(|s| s.as_str()).collect();
let allowed_classes: BTreeSet<&str> = accr.acp.classes.iter().map(|s| s.as_str()).collect();
if !create_attrs.is_subset(&allowed_attrs) {
security_error!("create_attrs is not a subset of allowed");
security_error!("create: {:?} !⊆ allowed: {:?}", create_attrs, allowed_attrs);
false
} else if !create_classes.is_subset(&allowed_classes) {
security_error!("create_classes is not a subset of allowed");
security_error!(
"create: {:?} !⊆ allowed: {:?}",
create_classes,
allowed_classes
);
false
} else {
// All attribute conditions are now met.
true
}
});
if allow {
IResult::Grant
} else {
IResult::Ignore
}
}
fn protected_filter_entry(ident: &Identity, entry: &Entry<EntryInit, EntryNew>) -> IResult {
match &ident.origin {
IdentType::Internal => {
trace!("Internal operation, protected rules do not apply.");
IResult::Ignore
}
IdentType::Synch(_) => {
security_access!("sync agreements may not directly create entities");
IResult::Denied
}
IdentType::User(_) => {
// Now check things ...
// For now we just block create on sync object
if let Some(classes) = entry.get_ava_set(Attribute::Class) {
if classes.contains(&EntryClass::SyncObject.into()) {
// Block the mod
security_access!("attempt to create with protected class type");
IResult::Denied
} else {
IResult::Ignore
}
} else {
// Nothing to check.
IResult::Ignore
}
}
}
}